Galileo’s Moon: Drawing as Rationalized Observation and its Failure as Forgery

Open Inquiry Archive

Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)

Galileo’s Moon: Drawing as Rationalized Observation and its Failure as Forgery

By Melinda Schlitt

ABSTRACT

Galileo’s wash drawings that survive – and to a certain degree, the etchings in the first edition of the Sidereus Nuncius – exemplify drawing as rationalized observation for the representation of knowledge and ideas as it had been conceived and practiced by Florentine artists during the previous two centuries, and which had been institutionalized in curriculum of the Accademia del Disegno. There is no doubt, in my view, that the drawings and etchings are in Galileo’s hand, despite recent speculation to the contrary as I note. Bredekamp and his colleagues – despite their misattribution – provided the great service of investigating the SNML in minute detail along with a rigorous analysis of Galileo’s imagery. In the forger’s failure to grasp the visual representation of observed nature in Galileo’s imagery in the SNML, lies its efficacy as a means for conveying the discovery of knowledge.

Full text of article available here.

Text copyright 2016 Melinda Schlitt

To find out how to submit feedback about this article, please visit the "How to Submit Feedback" page of this site.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s